Wednesday, September 22, 2010

18 Stages of Civil Suit under the Civil Procedure Code, 1908

 The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is the procedural law governing the process of adjudication of civil disputes brought before courts by litigants. As per the Code there are 18 Stages of Civil Suit as per Civil Procedure Code, 1908 are as under:


1. Presentation of plaint.

2. Service of summons on defendant.

3. Appearance of parties

4. Ex-parte Decree

5. Interlocutory Proceedings

6. Filing of written statement by defendant

7. Production of documents by parties (plaintiff and defendant)

8. Examination of parties

9. Discovery and Inspection

10. Admission

11. Framing of issues by the court.

12. Summoning And Attendance Of Witnesses

13. Hearing Of Suits And Examination Of Witnesses

14. Argument

15. Judgment

16. Preparation of Decree

17. Appeal, Review, Revision

18. Execution of Decree

 

The detailed discussion of all the stages are given below

 

1.Plaint (Order 7) :- The entire legal machinery under the Civil Law is set in motion by filing of plaint and hence plaint is the actual starting point of all pleadings in a case.

 

The plaint shall contain the following particulars

 

(i) Name of the court in which suit is to be filed.

(ii) Name, description and place of residence of the plaintiff.

(iii) Name, description and place of residence of the defendant so far it can be ascertained.

(iv) Where the plaintiff or defendant is a minor or person of unsound mind

statement to that effect.

(v) Facts constituting the cause of action and when it arose.

(vi) Fact showing that the court has jurisdiction.

(vii) Relief which the plaintiff claims.

(viii) Where plaintiff has allowed a set off or relinquishes a portion of his claim, the amount so allowed for relinquishment.

(ix) Statement of the value of the subject matter of the suit for purpose of jurisdiction and court fees.

 

If after submitting the plaint the court finds that it should be submitted before some other court the plaint could be returned, and intimation thereof can be given to the plaintiff.

 

The court has power to reject the plaint on following grounds:

 

1.Where it does not disclose the cause of action

2.Where the relief claimed is under valued and plaintiff fails to correct the valuation within the time fixed.

3. If the relief is properly valued but insufficient court fee stamp is paid and the plaintiff fails to make good such amount.

4. Where the suit appears to be time barred, from the statements in the plaint.

5. When the plaint does not disclose any cause of action.

 

In ROOPLAL SATHI V/s. SINGH 1982 3SCC 487 it was held that the whole plaint should be rejected and not a portion of it.

 

However the rejection of plaint on aforesaid grounds does not bar the plaintiff from presenting a fresh plaint. (ORDER 7 RULE 13 OF CPC)

 

2. Service of Summons :-  Summons is an instrument used by the court to commence a civil action or proceedings and is a means to acquire jurisdiction over party. It is a process directed to a proper officer requiring him to notify the person named, that an action has been commenced against him, in the court from where process is issued and that he is required to appear, on a day named and answer the claim in such action.When the suit is duly instituted summons may be issued to defendant to appear and answer the claim.

 

Defendant to whom a summons has been issued may appear in person or by a pleader duly instructed or by a pleader accompanied by some person who is able to answer all questions.

 

To expedite the filing of reply and adjudication of claim, the court may direct filing of written statement on date of appearance and issue suitable summons for that purpose. Failure to do so may result in Ex-parte judgment under order 8, rule 10.

 

The provisions of substituted service have to be resorted when the summons is not served by normal process through the court bailiff. Where the court is satisfied that there is reason to believe that the defendant is keeping out of the way for purpose of avoiding service or that for any others reason the summons can not be served in ordinary way the court shall order summons to be served by affixing copy thereof in conspicuous part of the house. (ORDER 5, RULE 20 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE.)

 

To expedite service of summons one more provision is relating to substituted service under which the court orders service by an advertisement in a newspaper, the newspaper shall be a daily newspaper circulating in the locality in which the defendant last resided or carried on business or personally worked for gain (ORDER 20 RULE - 1A)

 

3. Appearance of parties :- On the day fixed in the summons the defendant is required to appear and answer and the parties shall attend the court unless the hearing is adjourned to a future day fixed by the court, if the defendant is absent court may proceed exparte. Where on the day so fixed it is found that summons has not been served upon defendant is consequence of failure of plaintiff to pay the court fee or postal charges the court may dismiss the suit. Where neither the plaintiff nor the defendant appears the court may dismiss the suit. Such dismissal does not bar fresh suit in respect of same cause of action.

 

4. Ex-parte Decree :-  A decree against the Defendant without hearing him or in his absence or in absence of his defense can be passed under the following circumstances

 

1.Where any party from whom a written statement is required fails to present the same within the time permitted or fixed by the court, as the case may be the court shall pronounce judgment against him, or make such order in relation to the suit as it thinks fit and on pronouncement of such judgment a decree shall be drawn up.(ORDER 8, RULE 10 CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE.)

 

2. Where defendant has not filed a pleading, it shall be lawful for the court to pronounce judgment on the basis of facts contained in the plaint, except against person with disability.(ORDER 8, RULE 5(2), CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE.)

 

3. Where the plaintiff appears and defendant does not appear when suit is called up for hearing and summons is property served the court may make an order that suit will be heard ex parte (ORDER 9, RULE 6(1 )(a) OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE)

 

If an exparte decree is passed and the defendant satisfies that he was prevented by sufficient cause then he has the following remedies open

 

1. Prefer appeal against decree.

2. Apply for Review.

3. Apply for setting aside the Exparte Decree.

 

In UCO BANK V/S. IYENGER CONSULTANCY SERVICES, 1994 (SCC) 399 (SUPPLE.) it was observed that the words “Sufficient Cause” has not been defined and it will depend on facts and  circumstances of each case.“

 

5. Interlocutory Proceedings :- The period involved between initiation and disposal of litigation is substantially long. The intervention of the court may sometimes be required to maintain the position as it prevailed on the date of litigation. In legal parlance it is known as "status quo”. It means preserving existing state of things on a given day.

 

In that context interlocutory orders are provisional, interim, temporary as compare to final. It does not finally determine cause of action but only decides some intervening  matter pertaining to the cause.

 

1.Arrest and attachment before judgment Order 38

 

2.Temporary injunctions and interlocutory orders Order 39

 

3.Appointment of receiver Order 40

 

4. Appointment of commissioner Order 26

 

6. Written Statement (Order 8) :- The defendant is required to fiie written statement of his defense at or before the first hearing or such time as may be allowed

 

If defendant disputes maintainability of the suit or takes the plea that the transaction is void it must be specifically stated. A general denial of grounds alleged in the plaint is not sufficient and denial has to be specific. The denial should not be an evasive denial but it must be on point of substance. Every allegation of fact in the plaint if not denied specifically or by necessary implication or stated to be not admitted in the pleading shall be deemed to be admitted. (ORDER 8 RULE 5 OF CPC)

 

Before amendment 2002 in C.P.C. there was no time limit to file written statement by defendant. By amendment 2002 under order 8 rule 1 of C.P.C. defendant has to presentwritten statement within 90 days from the date of service of summons on him. Under this rule discretion  is given to court that if defendant fails to file written statement within a period of 30 days he shall be allowed to file the same on such other day which may be specified by the court but such period shall not be later than 90 days from the date of service of summons.

 

By Amendment 1999 in rule 1-A of order 8 duty is casts upon the defendant to produce documents on which he bases his defense or other documents which are in his possession along with a list.Such list of documents is he supplied with frie written statement.

 

7. Production of Documents :-  After filing written statement by defendant the next stage of the suit is documents. On this stage both parties have to file documents in court which are in their possession or power. If parties relay on some documents which are not in their possession in that case they have to apply to court for issue of summons to authority or persons in whose possession these documents are. The parties have to deposit in court cost of such production of documents. (Process fees and bhatta).

 

8. Examination of parties (Order 10) :-Examination of parties is an important stage after appearance. At first hearing of the suit the court shall ascertain from each party or his pleader whether he admits or denies such allegations of fact as are made in the plaint or written statement. Such admissions and denials shall be recorded. The examination may be an oral examination. When a party, if the pleader of the party who appears, refuses or is unable to answer any material question court may direct the concerned party should remain present in the court. If the party does not remain present court may pass such orders as deemed fit (ORDER 10 OF CPC.)

 

9. Discovery and Inspection (Order 11) :-  The purpose of discovery and inspection of document and facts is to enable the parties to ascertain the facts to be proved. With the leave of the court the plaintiff or defendant may deliver interrogatories in writing for examination of opposite parties which are required to be answered and which are related to the matter.

 

10. Admission (Order 12) :-  Either party may call upon the other party to admit within seven days from the date of service of the notice, any document saving all just exception. In case of refusal or neglect to admit after such notice, the cost of proving such document shall be paid by the party, so neglecting or refusing whatever be the result of the suit may be, unless the court otherwise directs and no cost of proving any such document shall be allowed unless such notice is given, except where the omission to give the notice is in the opinion of the court a saving of expenses. The above procedure is rarely followed by the advocates of parties.

 

11.Framing of Issue (Order 14):-  The next stage is framing issues. The job of framing issues is exclusively assigned to a judge. Issues are framed considering provisions of order 14 rule 1 of C.P.C.

 

Rule 1 sub rule (1) states, "Issues arise when a material proposition of fact or law is affirmed by one party and denied by the other."

 

Sub rule (2) states, "Material propositions are those propositions of law or fact which a plaintiff must allege in order to show a right to sue or a defendant must allege in order to constitute his defense,"

 

Sub rule (3) States "Each material proposition affirmed by one party denied by other shall form subject of distinct issues."

• Issues of fact

• Issues of law.

 

12. Summoning And Attendance Of Witnesses (Order 16) :-  On the date appointed by the court and not later than 15 days after the date on which issues are settled parties shall present in court a list of witnesses whom they propose to call either to give evidence or to produce documents.

 

13. Hearing Of Suits And Examination Of Witnesses (Order 18) :-  The plaintiff is entitled to have first right to begin unless the defendant admits the facts alleged by the plaintiff and contends that either in point of law or on some additional facts alleged by the defendant the plaintiff is not entitled to any part of relief. In such case defendant has the right to begin.

 

The plaintiff has to state his case in front of the judge. The plaintiff has to submit the evidence that was earlier marked. If any evidence was not marked earlier then it will not be considered by the court. Then the plaintiff will be cross-examined by the defendant's Advocate. The witnesses from plaintiff's side also have to appear in the court, who are also cross-examined by the defendant's lawyer.

 

The defendant also presents his side of the story supported by his witnesses and evidence from his side. The evidence needs to be be marked earlier by the court, otherwise it will not be considered by the court. The plaintiff's lawyer will then cross-examine the defendant.

 

14. Argument :-  As soon as evidence of both side is over then the suit is kept for argument. Once the evidence has been submitted and cross-examination is conducted by the plaintiff and defendant, both sides are allowed to present a summary of their case and evidence to the judge in the Final argument session.

 

15. Judgment (Order 20) :-Judgment means the statement given by the judge on ground of which a decree is passed.

 

The court after the case has been heard shall pronounce judgment in open court either within one month of completion of arguments or as soon thereafter as may be practicable, and when the judgment is to be pronounced judge shall fix a day in advance for that purpose.

 

16. Preparation of Decree (Order 20 rule 6, 6A) :- Once the judgment is delivered by a judge a decree is to be prepared by concerned clerk.

 

The decree shall agree with the judgment; it shall contain the number of the suit, the names and descriptions of the parties, their registered addresses, and particulars of the claim, and shall specify clearly the relief granted or other determination of the suit.

 

17. Appeal, Review, Revision :-

 

A. Appeal :- An appeal may be an appeal from order or an appeal from decree. All orders are not appealable and complete discretion of the appealable order has been given in order 43 of the code of Civil Procedure Code. The appeal has to be preferred within  prescribed limitation period before the appellate court. The limitation period for appeal to High Court is 90 days and appeal to District Court is 30 days. If the period of limitation is expired, then application for condonation of delay also is required to be moved.

 

B.Review :- The right of review is having very limited scope under the Civil Procedure Code 

 

A review application is maintainable only when the following conditions are satisfied,

 

1. If involves a decree or order from which no appeal is allowed or if allowed it is not preferred.

 

2. The appellant was aggrieved, on the ground, that because of the discovery

of a new and important matter of evidence, which, after the exercise of due diligence, was not within his knowledge or could not be produced by him at the time of decree or on account of some mistake, apparently on the face of the record, or for any sufficient reason, desires to obtain a review of such decree. The other side will be granted an opportunity to be heard, when any review application has been granted.

 

C. Revision :- The High Court in its revision jurisdiction can interfere in any case decided by subordinate court under certain circumstances.

 

The High Court may call for the record of any case which has been decided

by subordinate court and in which no appeal lies, if such subordinate court appears -

 

1. To have exercised, a jurisdiction not vested in it by law, or

2. To have failed to exercise a jurisdiction so vested, or

3. To have acted in exercise of its jurisdiction illegally; or with material

irregularity.

 

18. Execution of Decree (Order 21) :- Execution is the medium by which a decree- holder compels the judgment-debtor to carry out the mandate of the decree or order as the case may be. It enables the decree-holder to recover the fruits of the judgment. The execution is complete when the judgment-creditor or decree-holder gets money or other thing awarded to him by judgment, decree or order.



[Chanakya Legal is a Corporate Law firm based in North Bengal and specializing in 1) High Court Litigation - Writ Petition, 2) Non-Litigation -  FDI - Venture capital & angel investment; business incorporation; business name registration; importing/exporting; product safety; product standards; inter-provincial trade treaties; Legal Documentation; Vetting of complex global Agreements & Contracts; review of Banking & Finance related documentation; HR & Employment issues; IP protection; Transactional & commercialization issues; Cyber & IT laws; Review of procurement, Tender & RFP documentation; MSA, SLA, SOW & Amendments thereto; Due Diligence for Mergers & Acquisitions; Shares, Debentures & IPO; and training on Legal Compliances. While, preventing you - against entering bad agreement, criminal code, consumer protection, restrictive trade practices, deceptive advertising, infringement, and passing-off.]

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

C to Z of foreign law firm debate – everyone knows A, B

In this article we analyze the issue of liberalization of Indian Legal sector and the scope of Advocates Act 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘1961 Act’) in non-litigious matters. One important judgment, a recent case filed and some eye-opening realities will help our assessment of the entire situation.

Lawyers collective Judgment: - In 1995, a Writ Petition (W.P. No. 1526 of 1995) was filed in the Bombay High Court by the name Lawyers Collective vs. Chadbourne, Ashurst and White & Case. This petition was filed by Lawyers collective in public interest as according to them, the permission granted by Respondent no. 8 (Reserve Bank of India) to the Foreign Law Firms, namely Respondent no. 12 to 14 (White & case, Chadbourne & Parke and Ashurst Moriss Crisp) to open liaison offices in India, was totally illegal and in gross violation of the provisions of 1961 Act. The Petitioner (a society) concerned with the practice of legal profession and particularly concerned in ensuring that the ethical practice prevails in the legal profession in India, sought declaration from the court that the permission granted by RBI was bad in law and further that Foreign Law Firms cannot be permitted to carry on both litigious and non-litigious activities in India unless they are enrolled as advocates under the 1961 Act. The petitioner argued that the practice of law in India included the practice of non-litigious matters such as drafting documents, reviewing and providing comments on documents, conducting negotiations and advising clients on international standards and customary practice relating to the client’s transaction etc. and therefore Foreign Law Firms cannot be allowed to practice in non-litigious matters without enrolling under the 1961 Act.

The High Court Bench, comprising Chief Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice J.P. Devadhar, granting the prayer of Petitioner, held that the RBI did not have the authority to grant permission to these firms to carry on the practice of non-litigious matters, and also, that the practice of the profession of law, governed by the 1961 Act and the Rules of the Bar Council of India, includes the practice of non-litigious legal matters. Thus, "to practice in non-litigious matters in India, the Respondent Nos.12 to 14 were bound to follow the provisions contained in the 1961 Act." The court further held that the 1961 Act cannot be narrowly construed to be applicable only in litigious matter since in that case an advocate found guilty of misconduct in performing his duties while practicing in non-litigious matters cannot be punished under the 1961 Act. Similarly, where an advocate is debarred for professional misconduct can merrily carry on the practice in non-litigious matters on the ground that the 1961 Act is not applicable to the persons practicing the profession of law in non-litigious matters.

The above Judgment since then is deemed a precedent on the matter of entry of foreign law firms in India.

The Indian Legal Market and the Foreign Law Firms: - The Indian Legal Industry is estimated to be $800m worth. In the last two years the amount spent by India Inc. against charges and fees towards due diligence for mergers and acquisitions alone, is comparable to the GDP of a small country. India is fast emerging as legal supermarket and foreign law firms are keen to cash this opportunity. Apart from and other than advertising by organizing seminars on different international legal issues, below are some instances of the presence of foreign law firms:-

· Herbert Smith sponsored an essay writing competition in collaboration with Indian Law School,

· Clifford Chance had sponsored a moot court competition organized by the National Law School, Bangalore,

· Herbert Smith, Clifford Chance, Covington & Burling in the past few years shared their knowledge with law students by conducting short specialization courses,

· Linklaters financially supported setting up of new school near Delhi,

· There are about 38 ‘magic circle’ firms with their liaison offices or referral relationships with their Indian counterparts, while others strike up informal associations,

· Baker and McKenzie, have been amongst the most active law firms in India for the past two decades,

· Allen & Overy regularly advises on power projects, particularly in the oil & gas sector, acts for Indian banks, besides doing advisory work for corporate houses in India,

· CMS Cameron has advised the government of Orissa on privatization of the state electricity system,

· Denton Wilde Sapte’s Indian clients include Tata Electric and Gujarat State Energy Company,

· Linklaters represents clients in their disputes with the Maharashtra State Electricity Board,

· A large number of foreign accounting firms have already set up their offices and are clearly providing legal services in the area of Tax and Corporate Transactions,

· Indian law firms are reverse outsourcing high-end Patent application work to Foreign Law Firms in US,

· Allen & Overy sent their Singapore-based Capital Markets Partner, to allied firm, to boost its ailing capital markets practice,

· Linklaters and Clifford Chance have “best friend” alliances with Indian law firms and their managing partners stay in India for several months to improve integration.

So the Foreign Law Firms are already here.

The recently filed A. K. Balaji Case:- On 18th day of March 2010, one A. K. Balaji filed a writ petition W.P. No. 5614 of 2010, before the Madras High Court on the lines of the Lawyers Collective case (Supra). Respondent no. 9 to 40 are Foreign Law Firms, except Respondent No. 15 (Integreon) which is a Legal Process Outsourcing vendor. Other respondents include UK’s Allen & Overy, Clifford Chance, Linklaters, Freshfields and US law firms, WilmerHale and Shearman & Sterling. The Petitioner inter alia has alleged immigration law and 1961 Act violations. The Petitioner also claims that there is no true “reciprocity” as Indian Lawyers has to undergo cumbersome process, enormous conditions and restrictions and subjecting themselves to qualifying tests to practice law in US/UK whereas, to the contrary, Foreign Law Firms are silently capturing the Indian market through Unauthorized Practice of Law.

To wit:- While some contentions like Immigration law and 1961 Act violations are meritorious, I do not see any reason for LPO vendors to panic from the allegations raised against LPO companies in the petition. A managing partner of a magic circle firm coming to India on a tourist visa and conducting arbitration in hotel room is violation of 1961 Act and Immigration Act. The magic circle firm receives fees in its foreign account in a foreign location thus violating Income Tax and other Foreign Exchange Act. Clifford Chance had, in 1996 and 1997, advised foreign investors on English Law for the execution of certain power projects in India. The projects included the Bhadravathi Power Project, promoted by the Ispat Group, Electric de France and Alstom; Vizag Power Project promoted by the Machen Development and National Power; Ravva Oil Fields promoted by Cairn and Chase Manhattan and the Vemagiri Power Project promoted by GMR with investment from Avondale (Projects). The advisory work was undertaken by attorneys located outside India, and consequently, Clifford Chance's bills were raised and paid outside India. These issues need to be regulated if not restricted in the best possible manner taking the entire legal fraternity and governments of both countries in confidence. Since the matter is sub-judice I am hopeful that the court will do the needful.

Suffice it is to mention here that every country has body regulating unauthorized practice of law and both litigious and non-litigious matters are recognized as part of legal profession. To exemplify,

· The Court of Appeals of New York in the matter of New York County Lawyers Association (Roel) reported in 3 N.Y. 2D 224, inter alia held thus :-

“..........................Whether a person gives advice as to New York law, Federal law, the law of a sister State, or the law of a foreign country, he is giving legal advice. Likewise, when legal documents are prepared for a layman by a person in the business of preparing such documents, that person is practicing law whether the documents be prepared in conformity with law of New York or any other law. To hold otherwise would be to state that a member of the New York Bar only practices law when he deals with local law, a manifestly anomalous statement. .............................. As heretofore pointed out, the public is as liable to injury when an unlicensed person gives advice to an individual as to his legal rights under foreign law as it is with respect to his rights under domestic law. The State need not have separate examinations for those who will specialize in real estate law, patent law, mining law, foreign law, or any other law. There are many branches of the law that a Bar examination does not reach, but the test is a general one which all qualified applicants are required to take. And so all are equally subject to the same character qualifications. Thus it is not unreasonable to require that a person desiring to engage in the practice of foreign law be admitted to the Bar here and be subject to the same rules as every other member of the Bar of this State.”

· The Supreme Court of South Carolina in its opinion No.25757 reported in 2003 S.C. Lexis 293, inter alia held thus :-

“Based on the foregoing analysis, we hold that when nonlawyer title abstractors examine public records and then render an opinion as to the content of those records, they are engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. But if a licensed attorney reviews the title abstractor’s report and vouches for its legal sufficiency by signing the report, title abstractors would not be engaged in the unauthorized practice of law.”

· In the case of Legal Practice Board V/s. Wilhelmus Van Der Zwaan reported in (2002) WASC 133, the Supreme Court of Western Australia, has held thus :-

“The expression “administration of law” in s 77 is to be read as meaning “the practice of law” or “the practice of the law”. The practice of the law includes the giving of legal advice and counsel to others as to their rights and obligations under the law, and the preparation of legal instruments by which legal rights are either obtained, secured or given away, although such matters may not then, or ever, be the subject of proceedings in a court. If the giving of such advice and performance of such services affect important rights of a person under the law, and if the reasonable protection of the rights and property of those advised and served requires that the person giving such advise possess legal skill and a knowledge of the law greater than that possessed by the average citizen, then the giving of such advice and the performance of such services by one for another as a course of conduct, constitutes the practice of the law. Where an instrument is to be shaped from a mass of facts and conditions, the legal effect of which must be carefully determined by a mind trained in the existing laws in order to ensure a specific result and to guard against others, more than the knowledge of the layman is required. A charge for such service brings it within the term “practice of the law”.”

The allegations raised against Legal Process Outsourcing vendors are however abysmal. LPO’s work on a module wherein they are not a law-firm and do not provide legal advice in any domestic or foreign jurisdiction. LPO's train their peers not to get engaged in Unauthorized Practice of Law.



[Chanakya Legal is a Corporate Law firm based in North Bengal and specializing in 1) High Court Litigation - Writ Petition, 2) Non-Litigation -  FDI - Venture capital & angel investment; business incorporation; business name registration; importing/exporting; product safety; product standards; inter-provincial trade treaties; Legal Documentation; Vetting of complex global Agreements & Contracts; review of Banking & Finance related documentation; HR & Employment issues; IP protection; Transactional & commercialization issues; Cyber & IT laws; Review of procurement, Tender & RFP documentation; MSA, SLA, SOW & Amendments thereto; Due Diligence for Mergers & Acquisitions; Shares, Debentures & IPO; and training on Legal Compliances. While, preventing you - against entering bad agreement, criminal code, consumer protection, restrictive trade practices, deceptive advertising, infringement, and passing-off.]

Monday, April 19, 2010

List of LPO (TPSP/Vendors) with offices in India


[Although care has been taken in preparing the information contained in the table below, the information is provided for general disclosure purposes only, and author does not, and cannot, provide any warranty, guarantee or promise express or implied concerning the content, completeness, accuracy, currency or otherwise of any individual item of information provided below in the table. The below information is provided on the basis that all readers take responsibility for assessing the relevance and accuracy of its content. In case if the information is incomplete or you want to modify any part of it, please contact the author]

Below is a near-exhaustive list of LPO (TPSP/Vendors) with offices in India

Name of LPO

Location(s)

Services advertised in website

247 Analyst.com

Kochi

-

Abeesys

Pune

­_

Acumen LPO

Hyderabad, Secunderabad, Tenessee (USA)

Intellectual property, Contract Drafting and Management, Litigation Support and Due Diligence, Legal Research and Analysis, Paralegal Services, Patent illustrations, Immigration Services and Bankruptcy Services

Adec Solutions

-

Adroit Legal services

Delhi

Litigation Support, Contract review, Patent analysis and Research, Discovery and processing, Drafting and management, Legal Research, Regulatory and Compliance support and IPR registrations

Aeren LPO

Chandigarh

Litigation Support, Legal Research, E-discovery and Document Review, Deposition Summaries, Contract Management, Legal Drafting and Transcription, Document Management, IP services, Corporate Due Diligence and Transfer Pricing Services

AllZone Management Solutions

Chennai, California, Florida

Litigation Support Services

ALMT Legal

Bangalore, Mumbai, London

-

Amatra LPO solutions

Ahmedabad

Paralegal, Legal Support, IPR services

Amity Legal Alliance

Pune

-

Aphelionlegal

Chennai, Texas, Washington, New York

Document Review, Legal Staffing,

Aptara Corpn.

-

Artemis Legato Solutions

Hyderabad, London

Back Office Support, Legal Consultancy and Solutions, Legal Research of diverse and varying nature and Will Writing Service

Ascendlegal

Chennai

Legal Representation, Legal Research and Analysis, Legal Transcription, Legal Drafting, Coding and Documentation and Paralegal Services

AtlasLegal

Bangalore, Dallas, Texas

E-discovery, Litigation Support

Barrasso Consulting

Acquired by Deloitte

Beryl Lexsol

-

Bitscape

-

Bodhi Global

Mumbai, New York, Pune

litigation support, contract review, drafting and management, corporate due diligence for mergers and acquisitions, real estate, and legal and regulatory research

BPO Experts

Ghaziabad

-

Brain League

Bangalore, California

IP services

Breakthrough Technologies Pvt Ltd

-

Brigade

Delhi, Massachusets

-

Canatai

-

Centrilaw

Hyderabad, New York, California

-

Cenzatech

Chennai, New York

Litigation coding

Choir De Law

Delhi

Corporate Legal Services, Litigation Support, Document Management, Publishing Solutions, Real Estate Solutions, Intellectual Property, Customized Documentation, Para-Legal & Corporate Secretarial

Clairvolex

New Delhi

Intellectual Property, Contract Drafting Management and Review, Legal Transcription, Legal Research, Legal Publishing, Legal Translation, Trademark etc.

Clutch group

Bangalore, New York, Washington, Chicago, Cleveland

legal staffing, document review, contract management, compliance and legal research

Coalscent Technology

-

Cobra Legal Solutions LLC

Chennai, New York, Washington, Atlanta

Document Review and Management, Legal Research and Contract Management

Codemantra

Chennai, Oxford, Penssylvenia

Legal Publishing

Convergenius

NOIDA, Bhopal

Litigation Support, Contract Review and Management, Legal Transcription, Patent and Intellectual Property, Legal Research etc.

Corplo

Delhi

Litigation Support, Contract/Document Review, Corporate Due Diligence and Legal Research

Cosmolegal

Hyderabad

Document Management, Contract Management, Deposition Summarization, Immigration Services etc.

CPA Global

NCR, Jersey, Sydney, Paris, Munich, Frankfurt, Hongkong, Denmark, Japan, South Korea, Sweden, London, US,

IPR services, Document Review, Legal Research, Deposition Summaries, Litigation Documents, Contract Management

Crownbridgelegal

Hyderabad, Atlanta

Litigation Support, Document Review, Deposition Summary, Fact Research, Contract Management, Lease Management, Lease Abstraction, Contract Generation, Due Diligence, Intellectual Property etc.

Dolcera

Hyderabad, California

Patent Analytics and other IPR services

Draft n Craft

Delhi, London

Social Security Disability, Debt Collection, Deposition Summary, Bankruptcy, Foreclosure, Litigation Support, Legal Transcription etc.

Dynamic Media Solutions Limited

-

E ValueServe

27 Offices

Intellectual Property, Legal Support Services etc.

EconomicalServices

Delhi

legal research, legal writing, drafting and vetting of contracts including company incorporation documents, intellectual property related matters like patent search, patent drafting and trademark search and Tax Services

Edgesys software

-

-

Epalmleaf

Bangalore

Para-legal services, contract review, Background check, Intellectual Property, Litigation support and corporate compliances and governance

Epitome Ltd.

-

Evergreen Valley Law Group

Bangalore, San Jose

IPR Services

Exactus

Mumbai, Washington

Case summaries and headnotes, Contract review, Knowledge bases, Litigation Support, Legal articles and pages, Online research, Patent research, Translations etc.

EXL

NOIDA and about 18 other locations worldwide

Contracts, Legal Research, Litigation Support and IPR Services

EZENLPO Services Pvt.Ltd

Secunderabad

Document Drafting, Review and Management and Immigration Services

Fabino

Chennai

Litigation Coding

Fealty Legal Services Pvt. Ltd

Delhi, California

Patent Services, Intellectual Property Litigation and Transactional Support Services

Fortiora

-

Fox Mandal Little

Bangalore, Bhubaneswar, Chandigarh, Chennai, Dhaka, Hyderabad, Kochi, Kolkata, Mumbai, Noida, New Delhi, London and Pune

-

Fusion Legal

-

Globait Interaction Softech

-

Global India Law Group

Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Hyderabad

Patents, Trademark, Copyright and Litigation Support Services

Global Resource & Support Center (GRSC)

Mumbai, Hoston

Legal Documentation

Hermes Networks Pvt.Ltd.

Hyderabad

PERM,H-1B, O, L-1, J-1 & Student Visa's, Change of Status & Extension of Status, Labor Certifications, Permanent Residence/Green Card, Extraordinary Ability Petitions, Consular Processing, N-400 Citizenship, Checklists, cover letters & follow up

iDiligence

-

IDS Infotech Ltd.

Chandigarh, NOIDA, Mohali, USA, Netherland, London

Litigation Support, E-discovery, Legal Research etc.

India Juris

New Delhi, Chennai, Mumbai, New York

-

Indilexoutsourcing

-

Information & Analytics

Website not fully operational

Infosys LPO

Around 52 offices

Contract Management Services, Document Review Services, Intellectual Property Services, Legal Research Services and Other Litigation and Administrative Support Services

Innodata Isogen Pvt. Ltd.

NOIDA, NYC, UK, France, Germany, Netherland, Israel

Legal Coding, Litigation Support, Case Mapping etc.

InnovarIP Consulting Group

-

Inrea

Mumbai

Prior art services, Patent Analysis, Licensing Support, Patent Drafting and Trademark Search

Integreon

US, UK, PAN India, South Africa, Philippines, China

Contract management, drafting, and review as well as due diligence and legal research and drafting, Document Review and Legal Transcription

Intellextra

Delhi

Legal drafting, Legal auditing, Legal research, Due diligence and liaisoning, Trademark, Copyright, Patent and Legal Transcription

Intrust Global

Delhi

Legal Brief Writing, Legal Analysis & Memo Drafting, Case Summaries, Legal Document Review and other Paralegal services, Legal transcription, Legal Claims Processing, Coding & Indexing of Documents, Legal Data Entry, Forms Processing, Early Case Assessment Document Review, Contract review, Deposition Summary and IPR related services

Inventurus

Mumbai, Hyderabad, New York, Los Angeles, Alabama

IPR Consultant

Delhi

Trademark, Patent, Copyright etc.

IQ International E-service

-

ITAG Business Solutions Ltd

PAN India, 17 offshore offices

Patent, Trademarks, Design Copyright, Geographical Indication, Integrated Circuit Layout Design, IP Asset Management etc.

Iusjuris

Kolkata, Florida

Legal Research, Document Review, Litigation Support, Contract Drafting Review and Management and Intellectual Property Support Patent & Trademarks

Just Pillars

-

Kaden Boriss

Gurgaon

-

Kochhar Lexserve

PAN India, Atlanta

E-discovery, Litigation Support, Legal Research and Paralegal Services

Kpomaestro

-

Lapiz digital

Chennai, UK, US

Legal Coding

Lawmen4u

Amritsar

Pleading and drafting of various agreements, contracts, deeds, and other legal documents

Law Quantum

-

Lawkerz

Noida

Litigation support, Legal research, Due diligence, Contract life cycle management and Paralegal Support

LawKPO

-

Drafting, Legal Research, Transcription IPR etc.

LawScribe

LA, NYC, Gurgaon

E-discovery and Document Review, IPR, Corporate Transactional, Legal Research and Support

Lawvie Legal Services Pvt. Ltd.

New Delhi, UK

-

Lawwave

Chennai, New York

Litigation Services, e-Discovery and Document Review, Litigation Support and Technology, Contract Management Services, Research Support, Legal Research, Patent Research

Le’Matrix

Hyderabad

Drafting, IPR, Contract Review and Management, Legal Research

Legal Advantage

-

Legal Circle

-

Legal Ease

PAN India, Michigan

Legal Research, Litigation Support, Contract Drafting and Review

Legal Process Outsourcing Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi, Georgia

Document Review / Due Diligence, Legal Research and Intellectual Property Services

Legal Professionals-India

Delhi

Legal Research and other Litigation Support Services

Legal source India

-

Legal World Wide Services

-

Legal2Legal

Delhi, New York, Zurich

Intellectual Property Management, Contract & Contract Management, Litigation Services, Research, Due Diligence and Corporate Secretarial

Legasis

-

Lereo

-

Document Management, Legal Research etc.

Lex artis

-

Lexadigm

Gurgaon, US

Legal Research, E-discovery and Litigation Support, IPR, Contract Review Drafting and Management etc.

Lexecute

-

Lexedge

PAN India, Canada

Same as Kochhar Lexserve

Lexinsource

Kolkata, US, UK

Legal Drafting, IPR, Document Review, Contract Review and Management

Lexites

-

Lexoutsourcing

Mumbai

Legal research, Contract drafting, Litigation support services, Legal claim processing, Legal coding, Deposition summary etc.

Lexpertlinx

Hyderabad, Virginia

IPR, Contract Drafting Review and management, Litigation Support, Document Management and Legal Research

Lexsphere

Gurgaon

Litigation support, Transaction support, IPR services, Legal research, Corporate secretarial, Regulatory & compliance support

Link Consulting

Delhi, US

-

Lotus Legal

-

Loxodrome

Pune

-

LPO India

Gurgaon

Intellectual Property Right Services, Para Legal Services, Litigation support, General Legal Research & Review, Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Family Law, Contract Review, Amendments & Proofing

Manthan Legal

Bangalore, Florida, Vancouver

Document Review, Litigation support, Bankruptcy, Contract Review, Medico-legal Services etc.

Maximus

Pune

Document Review, Legal Transcription, Contract review and management, Legal Research, Patent Search etc.

Microbridge Solutions Private Limited

Chandigarh, Texas, Canada, UK

Litigation Support, Legal Research, Legal transcription, Litigation Coding etc.

Mindcrest

Chicago, San Francisco, Washington DC, New York, Mumbai, Pune

Litigation Support, Contracts Management, Compliance and Legal Research, Legal Analytics, Real Estate

Mindsprings Solutions

Chandigarh

Legal Research and Drafting, IP Services, Deposition Summaries, E-discovery, Litigation Support, Legal Transcription and Paralegal Services

Miracle Legal

New delhi

-

Naavi

Bangalore

Contract Review, Legal Research etc.

New galaxy

Mumbai, Pune, London, Chicago

Legal risk management, Commercial contracts, Legal Due Diligence, Legal document synopses and database creation

NovusPro

Gurgaon

Document Review, Document Management and Mergers and Acquisition related due diligence

Ntrust Infotech

Chennai, California

Lease abstraction and other related services

Office tiger

Acquired by DONNELLEY

Offshore Services To Lawyers

Gurgaon, Pennsylvania

Legal Research, Deposition Summary, Document review, IPR and Paralegal Services

Omniglobe International

Gurgaon, Maryland

Legal Documentation Services

Overlegengroup

Delhi

Litigation Support, Contract Management, IP, Real-Estate, Legal Research

Oxirient

Pune

Legal Research, Brief Writing, Document Review, Memo writing, Mergers and Acquisitions etc.

Pangea3

Mumbai, New York

Contract Management & Abstraction, Contract Drafting & Revision, M&A Due Diligence, Patent & IP Litigation, E-Discovery, Document Review, Litigation Support, Legal Research etc.

Patent KPO Solutions

-

Perry4Law

New delhi

-

Philips & Co.

Cochin

Legal Transcription etc.

PnB KPO

-

ProDigii Ecall Pvt. Ltd

-

Prodigy Infotech Chennai Pvt. Ltd.

Chennai

Litigation Services

Prodigy Legal

Pune, New York

IPR, Contract Management, Litigation Support, Bankruptcy, Document Review, Legal Research etc.

Proleptic Datacentric Pvt. Ltd.

-

Quatrro Legal Solutions

Gurgaon, Florida and 11 other locations

Litigation Support, Contract Management, Intellectual Property, Legal Research, Bankruptcy etc.

Quislex

Hyderabad, NY

Litigation Services, Antitrust, Contract Review and Management, Mergers & Acquisitions, Research, Real Estate

Raj Kishore Associates

Delhi, Chennai, Bangalore

Legal Coding, Legal Documentation, Legal Research, Generating standard formats of Pleadings, Complaints, Summons etc.,

Renuka Infocom

Delhi, San Diego, California

-

Research Dynamics

-

RKNA

-

RVS Global

-

Sai Outsourcing Company

Cochin, Mumbai, Australia

Insurance process etc.

Scope E Knowledge

Chennai, London, Virginia, Japan, Belgium, Netherland

Patent Search

SDD Global

Mysore, NYC, London

Legal Research, Legal Drafting, Patent Services, Litigation Support etc.

Southsoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd

-

SQ Global

owned by Quislex

Sumpraxis

Delhi, Florida, Virginia, Japan, China

IP services

Suntech India

Delhi

Legal Research, Contract Management, Litigation Support, Legal Transcription, Paralegal services etc.

Talwar & Talwar Consultants

Chandigarh, California

Patent Services, Legal Research, Litigation Support, Document Review, Deposition Summary, Contract and Paralegal Services

TIPTON

Prior Art Search, Patent Illustration, Legal Research

TMPserchers

-

Tricom

Mumbai, Chennai

Contract Drafting and Management, Document Review, Legal Research

True legal partners

-

Trustman & Co.

Tusker Group

Chennai, Bangalore, 7 US location

Document Review etc.

Unicita

Bangalore, New Jersey

Business Law, Consumer Law, Criminal Law, Employment & Labor Law, Family Law, Immigration Law, Intellectual Property Law, Litigation Support, Legal Research

Unitedlex

Gurgaon, Kansas, London, Israel

Intellectual Property, Contract Review and Management, Legal Research etc.

Valgen BP

-

Variante Global

Hyderabad, Pune, New York

Litigation Services, Intellectual property, Immigration

VEE technology

Bangalore, Chicago

Legal Research, E-discovery, Legal Motions / Legal Briefs, Contract Drafting /Contract Management Patent support etc.

Venkat's Law Zone

-

-

Verist Online

-

Vertolex

Pune

Verve communications

Pune, Dubai, London, Texas

Corporate Legal Services, Litigation Support, IPR etc.

Videnzale

Bangalore, Texas

IPR, Legal and Paralegal Services

White Forest

Bangalore

Wipro LPO

Delhi and about 90 other locations throughout world

Contract Management, Legal Support Services, Document Management, IPR

WNS

Mumbai, New York, Middlesex and 17 other locations

Property Law, Personal Injury Claims, Law Firm Back Office, Corporate Legal Support etc.

World Outsourcing Resource Center

Chandigarh, Delhi

Litigation Support, legal Research, Contract, patent etc.

Yantram BPO Services Pvt. Ltd.

-

Total Pageviews of this Post

Google analytics